An Open Letter to Everyone in the Movie Industry

For the love of everything holy STOP USING THE FUCKING SHAKY CAM!!!

I am seriously getting pissed off by all the movies using shaky cams. It’s distracting, unnecessary and amateur, and it causes headaches, eye strain and nausea in your audience.

For those of you who don’t know, allow me to explain what this shaky cam is. It all seemed to start with the movie The Blair Witch Project. It’s the style of camerawork where the picture is shaking and bouncing up and down, as though it was shot by someone holding a hand-held camera while running. In The Blair Witch Project, the shaky cam was necessary because it WAS shot by someone holding a hand-held camera while running. Unfortunately, many other big-budget movies have used this technique. Why do they keep doing this? It’s stupid!

Actually, I should slightly alter my previous paragraph. There are movies where the shaky cam is allowed, in films like The Blair Witch Project, Cloverfield, Paranormal Activity, Chronicle, and other “found footage” type movies. From Wikipedia: “Found footage is a genre of film making, especially horror, in which all or a substantial part of a film is presented as discovered film or video recordings, often left behind by missing or dead protagonists. The events on screen are seen through the camera of one or more of the characters involved, who often speaks off screen. Filming may be done by the actors themselves as they recite their lines, and shaky camera work and naturalistic acting are often employed.”

There is a perfectly good reason why the shaky cam is used in the above movies, because the characters in the movies are the ones filming. They are not professional camera people, they don’t have access to tripods and other things which would smooth out their shots. The characters themselves are running while holding the camera, thus the footage is bouncy and hard to follow. I would even go so far as to say that in these types of movies the camera itself is a character. I know it’s an inanimate object, but I think it’s true.

Therefore, I will begrudging forgive “found footage” style movies for using shaky cam. I will also forgive some documentaries, but they still need to use it sparingly. They should try to use a tripod or something whenever possible.

There is no excuse for using shaky cam in other movies, especially big budget hollywood blockbusters. In the past dozen or so years it feels that the number of these big budget movies using shaky cam has increased enormously, and the degree by which the camera is shaking is increasing as well. Just reading the Wikipedia page on shaky cam irritates me. I remember watching the third Bourne movie, The Bourne Ultimatum, and feeling queasy because of the camera shaking. I remember a scene where two characters are sitting in a cafe having a hushed, secret conversation, all the while the camera is shaking all over the place like it was mounted to a jackhammer. That scene was painful to watch. More recently, I watched Man of Steel, another movie riddled with shaky camerawork. At the beginning of the movie Russel Crowe is having a meeting with some high council people, and the camera would not hold still! It was vibrating like I do after I’ve had too much sugar.

Both of these scenes were dialogue heavy with no action whatsoever. Why couldn’t they hold the damn camera still?? I really want to know why the directors and camera people felt it was necessary to bounce the camera around during these scenes in particular. It felt as though the directors knew these scenes had no action in them and tried to inject some action into them by bouncing the camera around. It felt amateur.

You can’t add action to a non-action scene by shaking the camera!

Michael Bay, director of many action movies including the Transformers franchise, is well-known for his shaky cam use, especially during action scenes. During the scenes where one transformer is fist-fighting another the shaky cam makes it extremely difficult to determine which giant, shiny metal robot is which. You can’t tell which one is the one you’re supposed to be rooting for.  You can barely even tell what each is doing to the other. It comes out as an incomprehensible mess of metal rolling around on the ground. It is as though you are trying to watch a professional wrestling match while riding a mechanical bull.

Paul Greengrass, director of The Bourne Supremacy, The Bourne Ultimatum and Green Zone, was also criticized for his use of the shaky cam during those movies. Some viewers referred to it as “Queasicam”. Greengrass used more than the usual shaky camera motion to make it intentionally jerky and bouncy, coupled with a very short average shot length and a decision to incompletely frame the action. This took away from my enjoyment of these movies. I couldn’t see the action happening because it was out of frame half the time due to the camera shaking. My eyes could not keep up with what was happening on the screen, and I felt nauseated.

Zack Snyder, director of 300, Watchmen and Sucker Punch had actually rarely used shaky cam until Man of Steel. He had been known more for his slow motion action shots. Slow-mo is a very old technique where the action would be progressing in real time, and then would slow down significantly. This allows the audience to view the action in all its glory. You can clearly see what is transpiring, what exact actions the character is taking, what the result of these actions are, and what the character’s next move is. Here’s an example from 300. He’s gotten a lot of criticism for his use of slow-mo, and I personally disagree. I say “Screw you, critics! I love how Zack Snyder used it in his previous movies.” Everything was shot smooth and clear. I could actually SEE what was happening through all the action and chaos. I had no trouble discerning which character was which during a brawl, I was able to follow the action in combat scenes easily, and I felt it added more drama and punch to everything it was used on. I was quite happy with his direction until I saw Man of Steel. Gone were his glorious and smooth slow-mo shots. In its place was the jerky, jumpy shaky cam. I was a sad panda. I can only hope that this was a one-time occurrence.

Zack Snyder, I miss your slow-mo!

People of Hollywood, audiences want to be able to see the action that is happening on screen. They don’t want to see a jumpy, shaky mess. They certainly don’t want to see a jumpy, shaky mess during a non-action scene! So enough already!

Edit: Ok, ok. You’re allowed to use a little bit of shaky cam, but only during action scenes.

One thought on “An Open Letter to Everyone in the Movie Industry

  1. […] An Open Letter to Everyone in the Movie Industry […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s